GIST
British conservatives misled by uncultured alcoholics, pedophiles and dregs of their own. Is the alternative still viable?
Wise people learn when they can; fools learn when they must.
The above was said by the famous British military commander and conservative politician, the Duke of Wellington, Arthur Wellesley. Most would agree that the UK could do with a man like The Duke right now to take on foreign adversaries based on the things we’re seeing happen and the things that we aren’t.
Someone that would hold and win battles with his resolve wisdom and devotion to Man, God and Duty.
What can we learn? What must we learn?
On December the 19th many around the world, particularly, members of the political and administrative class along with the media of various countries eagerly awaited the release of The Epstein Files. These files were a peak into the life of the convicted pedophile, billionaire fraudster, Jeffrey Epstein. The released information has given us actual pieces for the invisible political puzzles we’ve been trying to solve for years. In 2025, we get to see plans laid out in 2019 for an eventual 2025, and looking at the world, one must agree that these plans have come to fruition but not in their entirety yet.
Apart from one of Epstein’s close friends and partners in crime being a member of the family that is supposed to be the pinnacle of Mankind from the island country, names of a few other unsurprising political figures from England have sprung up in these files in connection with the disgraced rapist. The files also show us that he was involved directly or indirectly in the highest levels of political dealings around the world. Epstein supported and cultivated Bannon’s right wing nationalist populism movement by personally arranging meetings between Bannon and various political figures and factions in many countries, by funding his travel, by managing logistics and setting up deals across the world. Epstein and his people moved using Bannon and his ideological front as a vehicle, thereby using Bannon to relay directions to political leaders of the world including UK.
To learn what we have received from these files, we must look back at what we know. The world and UK after 2010 visibly experienced a different slant in politics, with the advent of social media and the development of what we can call meme culture. This new technology and the ability to share enormous amount of information and disinformation in a short span of time gave impetus to the powers within the establishments around the world to co-ordinate and push more for conservative, right wing policies at the behest of a few select powerful yet greedy business conglomerates. In the UK this took the form of the Brexit movement.
A complete economic and cultural separation from mainland Europe. A movement based on inflammatory lies shown in carefully crafted short form videos and posts on social media wrongfully reinforcing previously held prejudices. A movement that went on to cost Britain billions in losses and two generations of population seeing dropped standards of living for a foreseeable future.
Advanced media tools to deliver targeted messages individually to vulnerable people exploiting their difficult conditions coupled with the sustained legacy media push off the back of far-right UKIP resulted in the Cameron Government calling for a national referendum in 2016. As we are told, 51% of the people voted to leave the European union. David Cameron resigned from his position of PM.
I remember clearly, before David Cameron’s resignation and all along the lead up to the referendum,he faced an onslaught of reputation damaging memes that were widely circulated across social media sites. Some of these memes were based on stories that would not have come out unless the powers that be and some in his own faction wanted them out and him out. We must remember the far-right UKIP leader Nigel Farage being the face and a fundamental voice of the Brexit Movement.
On Cameron’s resignation, Theresa May takes over as PM and is determined to see through Brexit smoothly. The economy tanks smoothly. She moves to get a Softer Brexit trying to salvage a tanking economy. The parliament including her own party members reject her proposed Brexit deal thrice. The optics get worse for her, as, in July Brexit Secretary David Davis resigns followed by her fellow Tory Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson resigning. May holds on momentarily despite a coordinated offensive.
The above events act as a prelude to the next which are relevant to us through Jeffrey Epstein, Steve Bannon and their talks.
According to HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027460 released on the 19thof December 2025,
On the Friday of November 16th 2018 at around 7 am, Epstein asks Steve Bannon if the Theresa May government would survive. Bannon responds saying “I don't see how BUT the guys over here have no balls” with Epstein replying “Exactly my fear. Pencil neck and all”
Bannon follows up “Boris ; Gove; Rees Mogg; David Davis -- somebody has to step up”
During this exchange, it appears that Bannon was in the UK and in direct contact with the names he mentioned to Epstein. Why did Epstein and Bannon want Theresa May ousted and what did they want the above four to do in order to achieve that?
According to HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029744,
on Wednesday, December 5th 2018 around 4 am, Epstein messages Bannon
“uk you should kick boris johnson in the butt , he can do it.”
What did Epstein want Boris Johnson to do?
According to HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027594,
On Tuesday, Mar 12th 2019 at 2:46 pm, Epstein messages “remarkable that the British pound is solid in the face of the Brexit vote. I assume the market believes an extension of time”
Bannon responds saying “Hard out no deal best outcome”
Why was this outcome the best? Why was it important for Bannon that The UK get no deal from the European Union?
Around the second week of May in 2019, when it became all but clear that May would resign, Boris Johnson publicly announced running for the leadership of the party on the 16th. According to HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027735, on May 26th
Bannon responds to Epstein’s message about his lunch with Noam Chomsky with
“Tell him the reactionaries are on the rise.”
“May gone.”
On 24th July, near about 2 months from Bannon’s message, Theresa May resigned and Boris Johnson took over as the PM of the UK.
Was there a coordinated, conspiracy to stop Theresa May from getting her deal because it was in some way unfavourable to Epstein and Bannon?
These emails lay it out clearly that Steve Bannon was in direct contact with Boris Johnson and likely helped his rise to the position of Prime Minister. In context with all his other messages and emails, one can come to a degree of conclusion that the whole conservative movement across countries in the world along with The UK post 2015 or well before that has been frighteningly deeply connected to a serial child rapist and his orbit of network. Facilitating these right-wing movements with large sums of money, logistics and advanced cyber warfare tools to help them constantly push out wave after wave after wave of never-ending inflammatory propaganda turning young able men into frenzied angry shell of former selves in this invisible war. Every single content online being a strike to cloud their ability to think right from wrong. Somewhere along here we must add in the possibility of apparatus to rig elections. Could they rig elections in a mature ancient parliamentary system like that of Britain?
I know they have in mine, although my republic's still in its infancy and has no defences against an attack of such nature.
What does one call those who interact, disregard, shield and use pedophiles for their personal gains, social, financial and political? Can these people on their own merit be considered not compromised for having been in contact with one convicted like Epstein?
In The UK, there is another pitiful attempt to bring about a conservative wave in the name of Reform, following the same game plan as Brexit, except instead of separating the British from the Europeans as earlier, it is now about separating the immigrants from the British.
These new set of reformers, of late, have been pushing for some reforms to make Great Britain greater again. As seen earlier, a few names are familiar and have carried forward after their previously failed attempt at holding power and furthering their movement, now under a new banner, yet again, with a same old unpleasant face. There are many questions when new movements arise, but none like,
how good a movement can be if a serial rapist and child trafficker is your backer and his close friend is your political strategist? How can you bring reforms being in such close proximity of something so inhumane and ungodly?
Additional questions are,
To what extent did Bannon and Epstein facilitate the Tories particularly the Boris Johnson faction?
Did Boris Johnson know Steve Bannon's association with Epstein?
Did Boris Johnson and allies resign from Theresa May's Government on Bannon's directions?
Did the British Government pursue policies in line with Bannon’s requests?
To what extent is Bannon involved with Nigel Farage and the reform movement?
Whom do young British Conservative men look for guidance, now when they realise that their supposed leaders have been gaining political help from a ring of Pedophiles?
At what point do the esteemed members of the British Parliament and Whitehall draw a line saying this is against the moral foundations of the British State,Society and Culture even if one understands the highest authority’s obvious reluctance to do so?
What happens when on calling in a favour, a pedophile or his accomplice asks of you to turn a blind eye to young British girls being assaulted, abducted,traded as slaves and silenced without a trace from your constituencies?
What happens when you deny reciprocating an earlier favour compelled by your conscience?
What happens when you find yourself in an inexplicable position in front of your daughter, wife, sister, mother and God?
While the virtues of modern conservatism would expect of you to not value the life of an immigrant girl equal to that of one that is not, what happens when you come to know that the above mentioned pedophile particularly chose victims that do not physically resemble the immigrant girls, rather those that looked exactly like Real British girls?
Now comes the most dreaded question.
Despite a few thousands more in taxes, was Corbyn the right proper man to represent you?
For even you would agree with reluctance and against all your senses that you could never see him, for all his faults, let such filth touch him or his people and his country for the sake of power.
Could you have been misled? Could you have been mistaken?
Could Jeremy Corbyn have been the right man to represent you?
Could he still be?
